Program Objectives

Main Objectives
Wage employment
Food security
Financial Inclusion
Self-employment
Market access
Social services
Diversification
Women's Empowerment
Environmental Management
Productivity
Social Inclusion
Resilience
Program Development Objective(description)

To sustainably reduce extreme poverty through the cost-effective integration and adaptation of the Graduation Approach into large-scale social protection programs in the Sahel. This three-year project supports the design, delivery, and learning associated with the World Bank’s Adaptive Social Protection Program (ASP) in Burkina Faso and four other countries in the Sahel (Niger, Chad, Mauritania

Program Components

TRANSFERS
COACHING
BUSINESS CAPITAL
FINANCIAL SERVICES FACILITATION
WAGE EMPLOYMENT FACILITATION
MARKET LINKS
SKILLS TRAINING
NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Average Program Duration for Program Beneficiaries
Under one year
Between one and three years
More than three years
Do Participants Access Components in a Specific Sequence?

Digitization

COMPONENTS DELIVERED DIGITALLY
TRANSFERS
COACHING
BUSINESS CAPITAL
FINANCIAL SERVICES FACILITATION
MARKET LINKS
SKILLS TRAINING

PARTICIPANT PROFILE

TARGETED POVERTY GROUPS

Extreme poor

PRIORITY VULNERABLE GROUPS

Women

Children

People with disabilities

ELIGIBILITYCRITERIA

Age

Sex

Poverty status

Having dependents

PARTICIPANT IDENTIFICATION METHODS

Geographic targeting

Proxy Means Test

Basic Program Information

COUNTRY
Burkina Faso
REGION
Sub-Saharan Africa
LEAD IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
Social safety net project Burkin-Naong Sa ya (PFS-BNS) and Trickle Up
TYPE LEAD
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
National/central government
START DATE
END DATE
PRIMARY ENTRY POINT
Social Safety Nets
P-CODE (WB PROGRAMS)
DNA
GLOBAL PRACTICE (WB PROGRAMS)
DNA

Country Information

Lending Category (WB Only)
IDA
FCV Country (WB FY20 List)
Yes
TOTAL POPULATION (Million)

17.59

POVERTY HEADCOUNT (NPL)

40.10%

POVERTY HEADCOUNT ($1.90/DAYPPP2011)

43.77%

POVERTY HEADCOUNT (MPI)

74.37%

NO. ECONOMIC INCLUSION PROGRAMS IN THE COUNTRY

5

NO. BENEFICIARIES (DIRECT & INDIRECT) OF ECONOMIC INCLUSION PROGRAMS IN THE COUNTRY

799,786

PLANNED RESEARCH AND EVALUATION

EVALUATION/RESEARCH TYPES
Needs assessment
Process evaluation
Impact evaluation
IMPACT EVALUATION TOPICS
Overall impact
Impact of different component variations
Impact at scale
NAME RESEARCH PARTNERS
IPA, ISSP (Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population-Université de Ouagadougou)
DATE WHEN RESULTS AVAILABLE
December 2020
LINK TO PUBLISHED WORK
N/A

Program Coverage

DIRECT BENEFICIARIES

15,428

DIRECT & INDIRE CT BEN EFICIARIES

91,334

PERCENTAGE FEMALE BENEFICIARIES

100%

Percentage of country population
0.52%
Percentage of country population under the poverty line
1.29%
Area/s
Rural
Geographic coverage
One state/region

Institutional Arrangements

Organizations Involved In Implementation Providing Financing
National/central government
Regional/district government
Local/municipal government
Nongovernmental organization
Community
Financial Service Provider
World Bank
Multilateral organization (not WB)
Bilateral organization
Private sector organization

Community Engagement

Components Delivered Through Community
  • Business capital
  • Skills Training
  • Coaching
  • Financial services facilitation
  • Market Links
Community Structures Leveraged for Program delivery
  • Informal community groups
  • Formal community groups
  • Formalized producer organizations
  • Local governance group
Does the program create/strengthen community structures/groups?

Contact Us

Colin Andrews, Program Manager
peidp@worldbank.org

DNA: Does Not Apply; FY: Fiscal Year; FCV: Fragility, Conflict, and Violence; MPI: Multidimensional Poverty Index; NPL: National Poverty Line; N/A: Not available; WB: World Bank